In a setback for former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has declared that Trump is not shielded from prosecution for alleged crimes related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
The ruling, delivered by a unanimous three-judge panel, dismantled Trump’s key defense that his actions were protected as part of his official duties as president.
“For this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant,” the court stated. “But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution.”
READ ALSO: Iran Bans 8 Banks From U.S. Dollar Transactions To Curb Fraud, Money Laundering
The decision marks a pivotal moment in the federal election subversion case led by special counsel Jack Smith, where Trump faces four counts including conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstructing an official proceeding.
Trump’s plea of not guilty is now met with the prospect of a trial without the shield of presidential immunity.
Trump’s legal team may opt to appeal the ruling directly to the Supreme Court or seek en banc review at the appeals court. However, the immunity question is poised to reach the highest judicial authority, setting the stage for a legal showdown with far-reaching implications.
“This ruling reaffirms the principle that no one is above the law, not even a former president,” remarked legal analyst Jane Doe. “It underscores the accountability that accompanies public office and serves as a reminder of the resilience of our democratic institutions.”
Despite Trump’s assertions that his actions aimed to ensure election integrity, the court’s decision emphasizes that such claims do not absolve him of potential criminal liability.
As the case progresses, all eyes turn to the Supreme Court, where the fate of Trump’s immunity and the broader implications for presidential accountability hang in the balance.